I just finished reading How
Children Succeed by Paul Trough. I was looking forward to the book because
its thesis that "grit, curiosity, and the hidden power of character"
are far more important than natural intelligence in determining achievement
reinforces my own deeply-held perspective. I wanted data and hard science to
substantiate this perspective. I must say, the first part of the book did not disappoint in this regard. In
the first chapter, "How to Fail," Trough provides ample evidence to
support the development of grit and curiosity as critical ingredients for
success. I’ve always felt that failure is one of the underutilized yet most
effective teaching techniques we educators have at our disposal. I especially
like the section on "attachment" and close relationships between
adults and students as vital elements in students learning how to persist.
In the rest of the book, Trough departs from scientific
research and instead provides the reader with narratives about individual
teachers, students, and schools. He becomes more of a storyteller as opposed to
an expert, possibly because it is easier to chronicle examples than to connect those
examples to real research. I felt that the salient points of his book would
have made a compelling article. Moreover, he never consolidates his findings
(what few there are), and as a result, the reader/educator/parent is left
empty-handed. I was looking for the proverbial takeaways, but they never
appeared. How disappointing!
I'm not giving up on grit and determination and character. I
still think these qualities are much more important than natural intelligence
in shaping a fulfilling life. I agree with Trough that our failing students and
schools are in dire need of more of this kind of "performance
character." I just wish Trough had provided the proof to make my opinions
rock-solid and indisputable.
How do you feel about these traits? Did they play a role in
your education and subsequent path in life?
No comments:
Post a Comment